Objective:
To determine the particle size
distribution of the powder material and the size of the solid particles by
using sieve nest.
Introduction:
A
sieve analysis is a procedure used to assess the particle size
distribution of a granular material. However, the most frequent use of test sieving is for measuring
the size spread, that is the particle size distribution. Test sieving is not
the only method available for particle size analysis, but it is certainly the
most widely used and probably the most important. The
size distribution is often of critical importance to the way the material
performs in use. A sieve
analysis consists of passing a sample through a set of sieves and weighing the
amount of material retained on each sieve. Sieves are constructed of wire
screens with square openings of standard sizes. Particle size, as measured by test sieving, may be
specified simply by quoting two sieve sizes, one through which the particles
have passed, and the other on which they are retained.
The materials which are tested in this experiment are
lactose and microcrystalline cellulose. The lactose is first weighed and is
poured into the sieve nest before being sieved by using mechanical shaker
for a fixed amount of time. At the end of the experiment, the weight of lactose
is recorded and the experiment is repeated by using microcrystalline cellulose.
The overall results are then presented in histograms.
Apparatus and
Materials:
Apparatus :
• Mechanical sieve shaker
• Sieve nests
• Weighing boats
• Electronic balance
Materials:
• Lactose powder
• Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)
Procedures:
- 100g of lactose was weighed.
- The 'sieve nest' was prepared in
descending order by placing the largest diameter at the top and the
smallest at the bottom.
- The lactose powder was placed at the
uppermost sieve.
- Then, the sieving process was allowed to proceed
for 20 minutes.
- Upon completion, the powder collected at every
sieve was weighed and the particle size distribution was plotted in the
form of a histogram.
- The above process was repeated by
using MCC.
Results:
Sieve number
|
Sieve diameter
|
Particle size range (µm)
|
Weight of retained lactose
|
Weight of retained MCC
|
||
Weight (g)
|
Percentage (%)
|
Weight (g)
|
Percentage (%)
|
|||
1
|
500
|
> 500
|
3.7539
|
3.8815
|
0.0037
|
0.0037
|
2
|
425
|
425 <x≤ 500
|
1.5485
|
1.6012
|
0.0058
|
0.0059
|
3
|
300
|
300 <x≤ 425
|
10.3604
|
10.7127
|
0.0670
|
0.0677
|
4
|
150
|
150 <x≤ 300
|
3.2168
|
3.3262
|
5.3241
|
5.3805
|
5
|
45
|
45
<x≤ 150
|
64.6972
|
66.8970
|
80.1591
|
81.0090
|
Base pan
|
-
|
< 45
|
13.1348
|
13.5814
|
13.3912
|
13.5332
|
Total=96.7116
|
Total=98.9509
|
Discussion:
Based on
this experiment, it is obtained that most lactose particles are in the size range
of 46-150µm
followed
by size range of less than 45µm and 301-425µm respectively. While as for MCC,
most particles are in the size range of 46 - 150µm followed by particles sized less
than 45 µm and finally in the size range of 151 – 300µm.
It can be deduced
that if the particles cannot pass a certain sieve of a fixed aperture, it is
because the particles are bigger than the sieve opening. Here, we can see that
most particles of MCC are finer than those of lactose. At
the end of the experiment, by observing the
total weight of the lactose and MCC before and after sieving, the weight of
lactose after sieving is slightly less than the before weight by 3.29% and
weight of MCC is lost by 1.05%. This has shown that there is a loss of powder
during the sieving process.
Therefore, the
particles might have been loss to the environment during handling of the
samples and it is because of some errors during conducting this experiment. This
maybe due to some particles been shaken away into the air as it is very light
and fluffy during the sieving process. There might be possibility that some of
the particles may have sticked to the sieve when we were removing the retained
lactose and MCC. The sieving nest itself might be contaminated with other
powder and it was not cleaned properly when we used the machine. This may have
affected our results. Besides that, the loss of lactose may due to the error in
weighing the lactose after sieving. There is possible that we did not tare the
weighing machine properly before weighing our products.The result might be
inaccurate as the vibration of the sieving nest is not significant or strong
enough in sieving the particles through the fixed sieve diameters.
Conclusion:
Based on the experiment, sieving process is one of the method
to determine the size of particles and the distribution of particles size after
conducting this experiment. Most
particles size of lactose and MCC are in the range of 46 - 150µm. From the
experiment above, we can deduce that most particles in MCC are smaller and
finer than those of lactose.
Questions:
1. What are the average particle size for both lactose and
MCC?
The average particle size for both lactose and MCC is between 46 -
150µm.
2. What other methods can you use to determine the size
particle?
Other methods that can be used to
determine the size particle are
elutriation, microscope counting method, using a coulter counter, laser light
scattering method,
dynamic
light scattering method, sedimentation
method and aerosol mass
spectrometry.
3. What are the importance of particle size in a pharmaceutical formulation?
The particle size in a certain formulation is important in
achieving optimum production of efficacious medicines. Besides that, it is an
important factor in determining the powder flow and also the bioavailability and
activity of a drug. Particle size can also affect the disintegration and
dissolution rate in the body cavity.
References:
References:
- www.geog.ucl.ac.uk/about-the.../support...methods/.../sieving-method
- http://www.pharma-excipients.com/micro-crystalline-cellulose.html
- http://www.pharmaceutical-int.com/article/particle-size-is-important-particle-analysis-techniques.html
- http://www.horiba.com/scientific/products/particle-characterization/applications/pharmaceuticals/
No comments:
Post a Comment